AutoTPRM · Portfolio

Vendor Risk Overview

Every third-party relationship across the enterprise. Ranked by risk score (basis initial findings), filtered, searchable.

Onboard Vendor
Portfolio
0vendors
▲2 QoQ
Shadow Vendors
0detected
▲0 new 30d
Risk Score
basis initial findings
0/100
▲3 QoQ
Residual Risk
0/100
▼6 QoQ
Open Findings
0
▲0 high
Contracts
0pending
Incidents 30d
0
Portfolio · Tier
0
Vendors
  • H00%
  • M00%
  • L00%
Findings · Severity
0
Open
  • High00%
  • Med00%
  • Low00%
Contracts · Pipeline
0
Active
  • Signed00%
  • Draft00%
  • Review00%
Geo · Concentration
0
Vendors
    Assessments · Status
    0
    Total
    • Done00%
    • Live00%
    • Queue00%
    Monitoring · SLA
    0
    Vendors
    • On-SLA00%
    • At-Risk00%
    • Breach00%
    Portfolio Risk vs Appetitewithin tolerance
    Risk Score Avg
    0/ 65
    Residual Risk Avg
    0/ 40
    Open Findings
    0/ 8
    Incidents 30d
    0/ 0
    Critical Vendors
    0/ 8
    Risk Matrix · Impact × Governance State0 vendors
    Business Impact
    Critical
    High
    Medium
    Low
    Uncategorized
    SHADOW
    INTAKE
    ASSESSMENT
    APPROVED
    REMEDIATION
    Governance State
    Top Open Findings0
      Regulatory ExposureVendors
        Top Risk Areas · COSO ERMScore /100
          Most Common Control GapsVendors
            Expiring ContractsVendors
            • Expired
              0
            • <30d
              0
            • <90d
              0
            • <180d
              0
            • >180d
              0
            • No Expiry
              0
            Control Effectiveness · NIST CSFavg reduction · 0%
              InherentResidualInherent → Residual
              Certificate Expiry Wall0
                Assessment CadenceVendors
                • Overdue
                  0
                • Due < 30d
                  0
                • Due < 60d
                  0
                • Due < 90d
                  0
                • On Cadence
                  0
                Fourth-Party ConcentrationDepends On
                  Critical Vendor ConcentrationBIA
                    Questionnaire Cycle Time↓ 0% YoY
                    0days avg
                    SIG · ISO · CAIQ
                    Median
                    0d
                    p95
                    0d
                    Shadow Vendors · Netskope + CASB
                    0 new in 30d
                    Detected
                    0vendors
                    Affected Users
                    0accounts
                    Data at Risk
                    0GB
                    Cost Exposure
                    $0Kest.
                    Detection Lag
                    0davg
                    BUs Impacted

                    Vendor Portfolio

                    0 of 0 · sortable · click to open
                    Vendor▾Business Unit▾Sources▾Tier▾Risk score▾Residual▾BitSight▾Findings▾Stage▾Assessed▾
                    no vendors match filters
                    open styleguide